Tags
communities, forums, g+, google plus, hangouts, osr, play-by-post
I’ve noticed a shift away from web forums and towards Google+ Communities for many OSR games and projects. While it’s certainly not a bad thing to get a community of interested folks together to discuss what they love, I wonder if this shift is splitting the greater old-school gaming community. There are some who don’t have and won’t create G+ accounts, I myself was reluctant to create an account, Google’s “real name” policy rubbed me the wrong way. If I want to be pseudo-anonymous, then I should be able to do so. From a practical sense, this policy was totally counter to the notion that people have different personas (personal, professional, gaming, etc.) and might not want them to become entangled (note: Google has since dropped the real-name requirement for G+). The ‘Circles’ concept is really kind of clunky when combined with G+ communities – you can’t post to a circle and a community at the same time, for example, or to multiple communities at once. And Google pages (what I ended up using to create my gaming persona) are really meant for businesses, so they are in some ways second-class citizens. For example, using the mobile G+ client, it is impossible to start a hangout using a google page identity. You can join a hangout, but not create one as you can using your ‘primary’ identity. There are also no separate features for Google pages – no Google drive, for example. If you want two, distinct Google document repositories, you need separate Google accounts.
So back to communities. I find them inferior to web-based forums in several areas. One big one is search. G+ community search is terrible – you get a plain text box for entering search terms and just two choices for filtering results – ‘most recent’ or ‘best of’. That makes search pretty useless, no searching post titles, or comment bodies, or showing all results, or results from a particular sub-community – all of which are common features in web-based forum searches. It makes the discussions seem ephemeral – once it goes off of the front page, most people will never scroll down to see it. This saddens me – I like browsing old forum threads for topics that pique my interest, many going back years on places like Dragonsfoot, Goblinoid Games or the ODD74 forums.
Second, the conversation format. Trying to follow a conversation on a post is difficult where there are lots of replies and especially where some are longer than a few lines – you have to select to expand those comments. You can post a link as a primary post, but forget about posting multiple links, or embedding them in comments, or quoting that reply that is 20 comments up the chain…it can’t be done, at least easily. You can always cut/paste, or manually type links or invent a quote format, but there is no built-in support for this as there is in forums. The commonly accepted format of replying to a previous comment by referencing the poster’s G+ name is not very helpful as far as seeing which comment you are replying to. All of G+ is very clearly based around mobile devices and one-off posts where you ask a quick question, show off a blog post, or picture, or some other bit of multimedia, and don’t really expect in-depth conversation. A short comment or +1, but nothing beyond that.
Now to be sure there are benefits to G+ Communities – they do make it easy to quickly share ideas, documents and point to blog posts. They pretty much eliminate spam (although you do still see the occasional blatant advertisement and kickstarter plug slip through, these are not too bad if they are topical). They make it easy to schedule hangout games, if that is what you are using. If you are a web forum administrator, managing a G+ community is easier, just due to the simplified interface. I have heard the supposition that people are better behaved on G+, but people can be jerks everywhere and I don’t think even the real-name policy stopped this.
A decent case study is the Swords & Wizardry forum – this has been ‘dead’ for some time, just about the time the S&W G+ community was formed. I can’t help but feel that lots of great ideas and conversation have been lost or just never posted at all, simply due to the ephemeral nature of the G+ community format or someone not wanting to join G+. It was about that time (in late 2012) I was getting into play-by-post (PbP) gaming, and while S&W was my game of choice, I went over to the Labyrinth Lord forums to play, simply because they were much more active (and still are). In fact, I don’t see many Swords & Wizardry PbP games at all on other forums, I think in part due to the nature of G+. While there is a large S&W community on G+, the format itself is not a good fit for PbP games. So maybe G+ attracts gamers who are already in face-to-face or hangout groups, leaving the PbP gamers to fend for themselves.
I’d be interested to hear from those who post to G+ or to forums exclusively, or to both. I post to both, but usually only for blog posts. Otherwise I just join in on conversations on forums.
Kyle Maxwell said:
I have mixed feelings about it, too. On the one hand, I’ve had some pretty terrible experiences over the decades on various Internet forums. Some of that really is due to the medium and the sorts of conversation tactics that it encourages. On the other hand, G+ isn’t really a great solution, just a nice-looking one where I don’t have to create yet another set of login credentials.
Doug said:
Thanks for the comments. I agree that for a lot of people getting into old-school gaming, G+ is the path of least resistance, since they already have a gmail account giving them a google ID. It is also a relatively new medium compared to forums. I suspect that if a given G+ community had the participation of, say the Dragonsfoot forums, the occasional trolls and flamewars would be inevitable. Or maybe the ephemeral nature of G+ conversations will prevent this, I guess we’ll find out as G+ participation increases.
guest said:
Yeah, I wont touch G+. I just read the blogs.
Seems like a lot has changed lately. Everybody’s making up their own shit, which is fine, but nobody is talking about old games. 5e is getting a lot of airtime. A lot of people are just posting pictures…
ERIC! said:
I was there when a lot of the migration happened, started forming the circles and all that jazz, and for a bit it was ok, I enjoyed it. However it has quickly devolved into folks with the inability or want to stop sharing personnel posts, cat pics and political trash I just don’t give a sh*t about.
You would get a string of really interesting posts on gaming, then a line of political motivated rubbish that just ruined the flow. Or you would be scrolling through some posts at work and some @sshat would post NSFW images and well….
So yeah I shut it down, closed my account and cut myself off. I quit Facebook 4 years ago for the same reasons.
I prefer my blog, and reading blogs, and the occasional threads on the Forums. The Social Communities are worthless.
Doug said:
I notice this, too. Google really wants people to use one account for everything (you can’t miss the “One account. All of Google.” on every signin page), and use circles to keep posts separate. But the interface is awful, and sometimes the sharing is inadvertent. I routinely get asked to add people already in my google page/gaming circles to my main account/personal circles. Or maybe you click the wrong circle when submitting a post. On a couple of occasions I’ve joined gaming communities with my main ID instead of my google page ID.
Pingback: New Swords & Wizardry Forums | Smoldering Wizard
Michael Hill said:
I used to follow the Delving Deeper forum at ODD74. Now there’s no content at that forum it’s all at the G+ site. For a game with a small following like DD, I don’t think G+ is the place for it to be. There are plenty of DD related posts but they are getting outnumbered by generic OSR posts, links to other G+ sites and more commonly, links to personal blogs, “Hey I have a comment about this thing… follow the link to my blog”.
On the plus side, a G+ site can do a lot of work for a small publisher and a few rabid fans can spread the word quickly. It has its place but it’s not a universal panacea.
Doug said:
“On the plus side, a G+ site can do a lot of work for a small publisher and a few rabid fans can spread the word quickly. It has its place but it’s not a universal panacea.”
That is probably the best use of G+ – as a networking tool for small OSR publishers. That, and scheduling hangout games and sharing google docs. My own gaming group has a private G+ community that works well for this.
Pingback: Thoughts on the Relative Success of Basic Fantasy RPG, Labyrinth Lord, and Swords & Wizardry | Smoldering Wizard
Pingback: G+ is Shutting Down | Smoldering Wizard
Pingback: Forgotten Gems of the OSR – The Holmes Companion | Smoldering Wizard
Pingback: Update and Thoughts on Blogging | Smoldering Wizard